🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Substantial Sum in Damages against Euroclear Regarding Frozen Funds Russia's monetary authority has stated it is claiming compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This move represents a clear warning from the Kremlin against plans to use frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine. The Substantial Demand According to accounts in Russian state media, the central bank filed a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim. EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days on a plan to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic needs. The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth. Divergent Legal Views EU officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. They argue rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine. Moscow, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, such as confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal. Geopolitical Maneuvering In comments interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States." The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions. Legal Hurdles Ahead Although courts in European nations are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that such holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm. European Safeguards European authorities said they are developing measures to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against EU companies. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected. Ukraine would only be required to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year conflict. Alternative Proposals The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget. Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition. Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."